As an American in my adopted country of Cameroon, I’ve had some time—just over one month—to process some thoughts on the impact of my Peace Corps service, of the agency as an instrument of development and my motivations for remaining here to continue my work as an independent volunteer. “Independent volunteer” is, perhaps, a convenient if not disingenuous label. Expatriate, freelance Africanist, reluctant RPCV, or in these, the waning years of Pax Americana, “21st century refugee” might be a better moniker. Despite the dollar’s precipitous slide, $4/gallon gas at the pump and multi-billon dollar federal bailouts of US financial institutions, living in Africa remains relatively cheap and easy for a foreigner. But I digress.
I will preface this by saying that I’m grateful to Peace Corps for introducing me to Cameroon and for the support provided to me during my two years of service. That said, I must confess that I’m no longer the enthusiastic, flag-waving advocate of Peace Corps that I was when my service began in 2006. I’m proud of my service and accomplishments, particularly of the small successes. But I harbor no great illusions as to the long-term, sustainable development impact of the work I or my fellow RPCVs performed, or to how far I went in fulfilling the three goals set forth by John F. Kennedy in 1961. A question I received from last year’s Q&A post went straight to the heart of the matter: who benefits more; the PCV or the host country? I gave the best answer I could then, a qualified one, but the seeds of doubt I held about the efficacy of my service—and more so, of Peace Corps itself—had already been planted long ago.
Since I began my service in September 2006, I’ve learned a great deal about the successes and failures of international development, reflected on a number of Peace Corps memoirs from Africa (from the classic to the questionable), and kept an open mind while considering the well-publicized criticisms [2] [3] of Robert Strauss, my former country director. Also during this time, I had an opportunity to witness the workings of the agency as an insider, and to see the strengths and weaknesses of Peace Corps.
Now, as an RPCV in Cameroon, I must add my voice to the growing number of concerned individuals who see Peace Corps as being guided more by historical inertia than by a clearly articulated development strategy. This is truly unfortunate, for I believe that Peace Corps has the potential to be among the best development agencies in the world. I’ll attempt to address the latter in a follow-up post. From this post’s title proud RPCVs and supporters of the agency might take this to be a vitriol-laden polemic, or worse, an unpatriotic attack on the sanctity of mom and apple pie. In reality, it’s neither. Nor do I wish to dampen the spirits of current Volunteers in Cameroon or elsewhere. Like most things in life, Peace Corps service is what one makes of it—and there are undoubtedly many dedicated volunteers doing valuable work at their posts.
Peace Corps as a Diplomatic Tool
Recently, a number of congressmen, all former Peace Corps Volunteers, sent a letter to the Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations and related agencies to request $400 million in funding for the Peace Corps in the 2009 budget. The letter, which was supported by a bipartisan group of 73 Members of Congress, makes reference to “foreign policy and national security interests” and calls Peace Corps “one of the best programs we offer…to reverse negative opinions about the value and character of the American people.” Rep. Mike Honda (RPCV El Salvador, 1965-67) said that, “the Peace Corps continues to be one of the most effective forms of American diplomacy.” Periodically, US Presidents and other political figures have echoed this phrase, nearly word-for-word, at press appearances for departures of new trainees. Few Americans, I think, would disagree with this sentiment. The agency, after all, is thought to embody the best that America has to offer.
Two years ago Niels Marquadt, the former US Ambassador to Cameroon, administered the Peace Corps oath to us at our swearing-in ceremony. The event was held on a grey August morning at the place de fête in Mbalmayo before an assembly of Cameroonian functionaries, local officials, PC/Cameroon staff, trainers, homestay families and we, the 39 newly-minted Volunteers in our matching pagne outfits. In his address, Amb. Marquadt called us “mini ambassadors” who were being dispatched to the far corners of Cameroon to represent the optimism, hard work and can-do spirit of America. We’d be doing the sort of grassroots diplomacy at the village level that embassy staff, sequestered behind their razor wire-topped compound walls in the capital, were unable to perform, he said. After a carefully measured pause, the ambassador asked us to stand and hundreds of pairs of eyes fell upon us. In the solemnity of the moment, right hand raised, repeating the words of the oath, I felt an unexpected swell of pride and patriotism. Less than an hour later I bid farewell to my homestay family, changed into a t-shirt, shouldered a backpack and boarded the first of several local busses which would eventually deposit me at my post.
In the ensuing months of my service, a much different picture than the one painted by the ambassador began to form. The vast majority of Cameroonians I met in Buea (better than 90%) knew something of Peace Corps, or at least professed some familiarity with the agency. With rare exceptions, however, almost no Cameroonian (or European, or anyone else, for that matter) was aware that the Peace Corps was an organization sponsored by the US government, or even vaguely associated with Americans. An all-too-typical exchange, either in French, English or Pidgin, went something like this:
Cameroonian: So, what has brought you here to Cameroon?
Me: I’m a Peace Corps Volunteer. I teach computers.
Cameroonian: Ah, yes—Peace Corps. Mr./Ms. [insert name here] taught me English/math/science in secondary school. So…you come from which country?
I was surprised to find that, of the 90% or more who knew something of the agency, fewer than 10% made any connection whatsoever with the United States. What astonished me most, perhaps, was not merely how common this exchange was in Buea, but that this profound disconnect seemed to cross social, demographic and geographic lines. Over the course of my two years of service, I’ve explained the American origin of the agency to a diverse lot of village farmers, students, teachers, university professors, journalists, prefets, district officers, police commissioners, provincial delegates, mayors, parliamentarians and various Cameroonian functionaries in nine (of the ten total) of Cameroon’s provinces I visited during my service. In the case of government officials, one might expect these people—at least through peripheral contact via official channels—to have some inkling of the national origin of the agency which has served their country for nearly half a century. In reality, almost none did.
Instead, what I later discovered was that “Peace Corps” is a generic label typically applied to predominantly white, Western foreigners who come to Africa performing various acts of volunteerism. All too often, upon hearing I was a PCV, a Cameroonian would respond by saying that they once knew a Peace Corps who started a Baptist mission in their village, ran an orphanage, arrived in a plane to distribute relief supplies, or (best of all) assisted in training their military. All of these acts, of course, fall completely outside the functions of the agency. Equally nonsensically, I once attended a send-off for a Japanese volunteer who was remembered fondly as “their Peace Corps.” It was at this same occasion that, after a second glass of champagne, a Cameroonian shared with me the public knowledge that “all Peace Corps are spies for the CIA” whether they know it or not. After a time I learned to bow to the absurd and gave up trying to correct Cameroonians on these misconceptions. In the presence of other PCVs during these moments, we’d exchange glances and subtly shrug our shoulders as if to say, “oh well.” So much for diplomacy.
If, after 46 years of service to Cameroon (among the longest continuously running Peace Corps programs in the world) the average Cameroonian hasn’t the vaguest notion that Peace Corps is even an American agency, I have to cast serious doubt on the value of its diplomatic mission. Best and most effective? Not by a long shot. I’ve often wondered how the public (mis)conception of Peace Corps here in Cameroon compares with the agency’s efforts elsewhere in the world. Am I alone in this assessment? Part of me wishes it were so. The better part of me, however, has no choice but to conclude that the Congressman’s and Ambassador’s assertions of Peace Corps as a diplomatic tool falls terribly short of their vision.
Comments are welcome. More to follow soon.